Development Lifecycle Recommendations in FIWARE
- The SCM Tool MUST be GitHub. Accompanying tools or plugins that integrate well with GitHub (ex. Gerrit) MAY be used.
- GitHub MUST be used during the whole development lifecycle.
- The name of the GitHub Repository MAY be 'fiware' + '-' + "Code Name of
your GE". Example:
- The GitHub Repository content MUST meet the GE Publication Requirements
When the GE code is spread over various repositories, the FIWARE hyperlinks can be included on the
README.mdpertaining to the main repository or at the GH user/organization level.
Every repository in GitHub SHOULD have at least one branch corresponding to the main development line, usually named
master, and a certain number of additional branches/tags corresponding to releases.
- Every repository in GitHub SHOULD comply with the GitHub recommended
community standards checklist - e.g.
- Every repository in GitHub SHOULD have a one line repository description - the description SHOULD NOT be left blank
- Where ReadtheDocs documentation exists for a repository in Github, the GitHub repository URL SHOULD link back to the latest ReadtheDocs documentation - the URL SHOULD NOT be left blank
- Every repository in GitHub SHOULD include a list of related topics
including the following:
- The name of the most frequently used related tag on Stack Overflow e.g.
- Other relevant descriptive tags e.g.
securityetc. MAY be added.
- When a GitHub repository is sample code related a Generic Enabler, it
SHOULD also add the relevant Stack Overflow tag for that GE e.g. a
python script generating context data for Orion should also include the
Apart from the minimal, mandatory lifecycle described by the GE Requirements the following guidelines also apply.
The development lifecycle of a GE SHOULD be as follows:
When developing a new feature / bug try to divide the work into smaller parts. For instance, dividing by frontend and backend implementation. There can be other criteria that might depend on each feature / bug. The aim of this division is to simplify the review process. Big commits are usually hard to review, hard to change later and prone to conflicts.
Once you have divided the work in parts, the implementation of each part SHOULD be done in a different branch that you will use later to Pull Request to the GE Repository. One recommended practice is that you fork the original repository to your GH account and develop the feature in your own branch (which will belong to your own repository). Later, you will make a Pull Request from that branch to the GE repository. See branching model.
The Pull Request SHOULD include not only the feature's source code but unit or integration tests together with relevant documentation.
At the time of landing (merging), a Pull Request SHOULD include only one commit. While developing you MAY have more than one commit but ultimately only one commit SHOULD remain. For doing so, use the git squash functionality.
Nonetheless, there can be situations for which a Pull Request might be better explained with more than one commit. In that particular case you SHOULD also try to squash your commits into functionally coherent blocks. Nonetheless, every commit message MUST be descriptive of what feature or bug the code is implementing, for instance:
ISSUE 345. POST Operation /entities. Part I Parsing Requests. ISSUE 345. POST Operation /entities. Part II DB Persistence. ISSUE 345. POST Operation /entities. Part III Rendering Responses.
Once a Pull Request is done, a code review will be performed. Find a competent reviewer that can perform a code review. There can be more than one reviewer but one of them SHOULD be a main developer or technical owner/architect of the project. Typically the reviewer will test the feature, review the code (style, robustness, structure, performance) and suggest some changes. The code review MUST be made using the code review facilities provided by GitHub.
Try to address all the comments suggested by reviewers. If a comment is not going to be addressed a rationale SHOULD be provided.
Wait for a final positive review. This MAY imply one or more iterations over steps 5 and 6.
Land (merge) the new code. But before landing ensure that all tests are passing. Under certain conditions your Pull Request could not be directly landed (merged). In that case you would need to rebase your branch with the master branch, resolve all conflicts, push them and finally merge the new code in the master branch. Nobody can auto-merge their contributions.
If later you discover that new code is breaking something do not hesitate to back out the culprit code. That's the advantage of landing only one commit. Backing out code is as easy as
git revert <commit_hash>.
GE projects developed as open source SHOULD have a public continuous integration system.
The continuous integration system SHOULD be running every time a new Pull Request (PR) is done. As a result the PR owner can know in advance if her code is breaking something.
Before landing new code the continuous integration system MAY be run in a temporary branch that merge the Pull Request and the destination branch. Nonetheless, in the event of continuous integration errors the (offending) code MUST be backed out or a fix SHOULD be provided urgently. Use git revert for the former.
Travis-CI MAY be your continuous integration system as it is super-easy to integrate it with GitHub. Jenkins is another popular tool which has the advantage of being able to run on different OS.
You MUST include Travis badges (or other badges) in your
file. Travis badges can be used to report the current status of your build, (it
SHOULD be green!).
A Tracking system MUST be used in order to manage the development work. Such tracking system MUST include at least all the bugs/known issues of your component.
The Tracking system SHOULD be public. You MAY use the JIRA as a public tracking tool.
When a commit is actually solving a bug/issue there MUST be a cross-reference between the commit message and the corresponding bug/issue in the Tracking System.
When users report a new bug, it SHOULD be given an estimation of when the bug will be solved. If the bug is consider minor or a very edge case and it will not be resolved, it SHOULD be marked as 'WontFix' and closed. This decision MUST be communicated to the reporter together with a suggested workaround.
The roadmap of your component SHOULD be public. Please check the General Roadmap Requirements
Be prepared for external contributions. When someone makes a Pull Request be responsive and consider carefully the proposal made. If you want to create community around your component you SHOULD be open minded. On the other hand code authored by external contributors SHOULD not break the basic design principles of your component. Be prepared for trade-offs.
Project repositories SHOULD automate coding formatting and run code
linters/style checkers as part of the CI testing process where possible - e.g.
Checkstyle, Lint4j, ESLint etc. A list of suitable tools can be
To attract active support community, code SHOULD regularly be upgraded to the latest LTS libraries and versions of dependencies - e.g. Java 8,9,10 rather than Java 1.4; ECMAScript 6 rather than ECMAScript 5 etc. Ideally such changes can also be applied automatically, but MUST be tested.
Versions of dependent libraries with known vulnerabilities SHOULD be upgraded
You SHOULD include Synk badges (or other badges) in your
file. Synk can be used to report the vulnerabilities of your build, (it
SHOULD be green!).
Apart from meeting the General Documentation Requirements the following guidelines apply.
To avoid documentation inconsistencies, development related documents MUST be handled in the same way than Source Code, this implies:
- Developer oriented documentation MUST be included as part of the GitHub content.
- Markdown (.md) is the recommended format for document files. Restructured Text (reST) might be used as well.
- Additional developer oriented documentation (advanced topics) MUST be present in a '/doc' folder at the root of your repository (or in an specific documentation repository associated to the GE). It is noteworthy that you MUST use an approved markup notation format if you want to benefit from automatic documentation generation systems (ReadTheDocs).
- Code and documentation MUST be synced. To this aim, every Pull Request with any impact in existing documentation SHOULD include any related documentation changes.
- Inconsistencies or lacks of documentation SHOULD be detected in Code Reviews and QA phases, opening bugs when necessary.
README.mdMUST be always present in the root folder of any repository associated to the GE. The purpose of such a document associated to a GE is to document:
- GE overall description.
- How to Deploy the GE (basic/default installation procedure)
- How to run tests
- A walkthrough guide on using the main APIs
- How to get access to the advanced API and Documentation topics
In general the structure of the
README.md SHOULD follow a standard format
such as standard-readme.
More specifically, the referred
README.md SHOULD include:
Simple GE/Service Description and purpose -
- The first paragraph SHOULD be an elevator pitch about the purpose of the repository (Since this is displayed on GitHub on mobile)
- Include direct ReadtheDocs links to the User Guide, Admin Guide in a subsequent introductory paragraph (To allow users to navigate directly between code and documentation )
- Include information about testbed environments if available
Then add a Table of Contents to make navigation through the rest of the document easier
How to Build & Install
- Make your simplest full stack deployment as easy as possible
- Include System requirement info: SO, CPU/Storage Capacity...
- Include installation support for your dependencies
- Provide a “Hello World” example using curl (basic acceptance test)
- Include troubleshooting information for the whole process
API Overview of the main data flow
- It is a tutorial, not a reference. It does not need to be exhaustive, it needs to guide the user
- Provide always curl examples for this section
More API Examples
- Just the important bits of your API used in examples
A link to the API Reference Documentation. Open API SHOULD be used.
How to run tests
- End-to-end tests (SHOULD). This will be part of the sanity checks included in the "Installation & Administration Guide", thus a link will be needed.
- Unit tests (SHOULD)
- Performance tests (MAY)
List of links to Advanced topics (/doc folder)
- User & Programmers Manual (MUST)
- Installation & Administration Guide (MUST)
- Other documents, for instance: HA deployment, detailed architecture, Advanced configuration topics, advanced functionalities, ...
Developer Oriented Documentation (ReadtheDocs)
The name of the project on ReadtheDocs SHOULD match the Stack
Overflow tag and Docker image name, e.g.
Admin access to each ReadtheDocs documentation project MUST be granted
to multiple accounts. This SHOULD include the current owner of the enabler,
and MAY also be granted the
fiware user account - this avoids lock-out in
case an individual administrator is unavailable.
The Documentation title on ReadtheDocs (i.e. the
site_name within the
mkdocs.yml) MUST reflect the name of the enabler. The title MAY match
the Stack Overflow tag or alternatively the
site_name MAY consist of the
enabler name wihout the 'fiware' prefix.
The basic format of the Developer Documentation SHOULD consist of the following sections in the following order
- Getting Started SHOULD - simple responses from the GE - e.g.
- User/Programmer's Guide MUST - how to use the GE
- Installation/Admin Guide MUST - how to install the GE, both directly from source and via Docker
- Deprecated Functionality MAY - any functionality that is no longer supported or deprecated
Running tests, contributing code & etc. SHOULD be linked directly from the
README.md, but SHOULD NOT be part of the ReadtheDocs Documentation -
the justification is that many users of the software are not interested in
contributing, but need to find user instructions alone without bloat in the
Table-of-Contents listings MAY be added at the head of each file, but
MUST come directly after the main
<h1> header, and MUST NOT be
<h2> Table of Contents Header of their own. This means the
Table of Contents can be used for navigation if reading the unstyled Markdown
files on GitHub, but can be hidden using CSS within the ReadtheDocs
documentation itself and avoid duplication with the sidebar Navigation.
Markdown for ReadtheDocs MUST NOT use HTML rendering such as
as the navigation is unpredictable and may no longer work correctly in
ReadtheDocs. An exception can be made for documentation using an extended
character set (e.g. Japanese) which require these tags for headings.
Markdown for ReadtheDocs may use
<h1>...<h6> HTML headers if necessary to
suppress entries in the ReadtheDocs sidebar.
GEs SHOULD be configurable through a
Docker images for GEs SHOULD be configurable. through
ENV variables. Where
this is not possible or desirable, the
README.md MUST explain how to mount
a volume to set the configuration.
If the GE can be configured through a config file, a template/example configuration file MUST be present and fully aligned with every version.
The config file MUST be seen as part of the documentation (for integrators and deployers). So it is mandatory to document every config param, its available options and operation advices. Redis configuration is an illustrative example.
Software Releases (source code)
Apart from meeting the general Release Requirements the following guidelines apply.
Each code release SHOULD be properly tagged in your GitHub repository.
Each component SHOULD always show a consistent view in the “Releases” and “Tags” tabs at GitHub.com. Examples:
The release notes SHOULD include links for downloading the source code.
The release notes associated to each Release SHOULD include the change log for that release, i.e. the list of changes regarding the previous version, including (if possible) links to the GitHub issues related to each change.
GEs MUST provide Docker containers according to Docker Guidelines.
Additional Repository Content
Files describing the Licensing and Contribution Policy MUST be included in the repository. Please check the General GE Licensing Requirements. They MUST be consistent with those reflected in the FIWARE Catalogue.
Apart from meeting the general Ecosystem Support and Quality Requirements the following guidelines apply:
Where relevant, Stack Overflow SHOULD be used for thorough technical questions. Educate your users to tag their questions properly in Stack Overflow.
Each FIWARE GE MUST be associated to an Stack Overflow tag. Such tag could
be specific for a GE or default to a chapter generic tag, for instance
Stack Overflow tags SHOULD be of the form
fiware-<GE codename>. Example
fiware-orion. Creating new tags requires Stack Overflow Karma. You MAY ask
someone from the FIWARE community with enough Karma to create tags for your GE.
Otherwise you can use the FIWARE Q&A platform.
- Exception to the rule: In the case the GE is associated to an existing
tag (e.g. the tag was created before that GE joined FIWARE), it could be
used instead of the usual
fiware-XXXXas an exception, as long as the two following conditions occur:
1. the tag clearly reflect the name of the GE, 2. the tag is already widely used in Stack Overflow (i.e. more than 30 questions using it).
Anyway, this is a workaround valid only in the case a tag synonym cannot be created due to reputational constraints.
New releases of your components SHOULD be announced through different channels: FIWARE Blog, dedicated Twitter or similar channels, your own Blog ...
To build and maintain the FIWARE community, it is essential that the team responsible for each product to openly engage with the wider development community, therefore responding to User Support requests in a timely manner is a MUST.
- If an external developer has found an issue with existing functionality which cannot be fixed in a timely manner, a known issue MUST be added to the documentation.
- If an external developer has found a fixable issue with existing functionality an alternative workaround MUST be provided, and the code patched as soon as possible.
- If an external developer suggests support for a new feature is not implemented / not available, an alternative workaround SHOULD be provided where possible.